Another View

ANOTHER VIEW: Many factors mean biannual clock-flip survives

Via Unsplash

By Tom Fort

SNELLVILLE, Ga.  |  We keep flipping the clocks because it keeps the right donors happy, spares Congress from choosing sides, and lets both parties dodge blame.

Fort

Republicans push permanent Daylight Saving Time (DST) on paper, but members from the western edges of time zones, where winter sunrises already arrive late, hear nonstop about dark mornings; Democrats split similarly, with northern districts fearing black-as-coal bus stops while eastern-edge and Sun Belt districts like the brighter evenings for recreation and business.

So everyone gets to complain about the clock change while quietly refusing to choose.

States’ “we fixed it!” bills are press releases, not policy. Legislatures across the South passed trigger laws for permanent DST, conveniently forgetting 1974, but the Uniform Time Act still blocks them without Congress. Meanwhile Arizona and Hawaii prove the local-conditions point by sticking with permanent Standard Time because late-day heat (and latitude) make “extra” evening sun a problem, not a benefit.

Political donation money tilts toward evening light—and it lives where evenings are busy. Retail, convenience, restaurants, candy, golf, and youth sports bankroll the talking points about after-work activity from 6–8 p.m., while sleep and pediatric groups show up with the science and smaller budgets. Guess which side fills hearing rooms and donor lists?

Health experts say “lock in Standard Time,” and the west-edge data backs them—but politics doesn’t. People living on the western side of time zones show worse sleep and health outcomes under later sunrises; that’s compelling in testimony and forgettable when a member from a golf-and-grill district reminds colleagues how nice long summer evenings feel at checkout.

Polls don’t rescue anyone. Ask the question one way and you get a lean to permanent DST; ask it another and you get a lean to permanent Standard Time. Break it by geography—north vs. south, west-edge vs. east-edge—and you’re right back to conflicting “lived experience,” which is Capitol Hill code for “no safe vote.”

The 1974 ghost and 2025 grandstanding keep it muddled. Trump praised permanent DST this year while calling it basically a 50–50 issue, giving both parties cover to posture and stall; the memory of 1974’s dark winter mornings finishes the job, because no one volunteers to resurrect that disaster.

Bottom line: geography splits the public, money favors evening light, health favors morning light, and both parties are cross-pressured. Until someone protects evening cash registers in the south AND east and morning safety in the west and north—with zero political downside—the biannual clock-flip survives.

Share